Before you compare vendors: answer these four questions

A DMS selection rarely gets difficult because of the vendor. It gets difficult when your own picture is too blurry. Answer these four questions first and your conversations get shorter, and the quotes you compare are actually comparable.

What is your primary process pain?

Not "we need a DMS", but "invoices sit in folders for 12 days" or "files cannot be found after 6 months". A concrete pain leads to a concrete first use case, and that is your anchor for the whole selection.

What does your IT landscape look like today?

Which systems are in use (ERP, financial accounting, CRM)? Which data sources are critical? Which interfaces already exist? This inventory decides which integrations you really need and which are merely nice to have.

Who decides, who uses it, who pays?

IT? Management? Accounting? A common trap: IT decides on technical criteria, but the department has to work with the result. Clarify before the selection who has a say, and where a veto applies.

Where do you want to be in 3 years?

More locations? More legal entities? Twice the volume? Going international? In marketing, scalability is always a yes. In practice, the scaling curves differ widely. Growth assumptions shape the selection heavily.

You can work out your four answers in three minutes: the self-check sorts departments, volumes and systems, and carries your answers straight into an enquiry if you want it to.

The 6 real selection criteria

Criteria lists get long fast. Here are six on which a selection in a mid-sized company tends to turn. The order is not a ranking, it is a suggestion for the sequence in which to work through them.

1

Use case depth instead of feature breadth

A complete feature list says nothing about daily practice. What matters is how deep the system goes for your primary use case. If accounts payable is your main topic, check OCR quality, validation rules and approval workflows not only against polished demo data but against your own documents before you roll out widely, for example in a limited pilot operation with your most important use case.

2

Integration with your existing IT

A connection to your accounting system? To your ERP? The question is not "can the system connect to X", but "is that connection running in production, at what effort and at what depth". A connection already live in production is a different thing in a project than one that still has to be built: the latter costs effort during rollout and stays with you in maintenance.

3

Scalability for your growth expectations

Volume per month, number of users, number of legal entities, number of locations. Systems are cut for different shapes: some for small teams, others for group structures, and the two rarely fit your size equally well. Ask for experience from comparable projects of your size.

4

Compliance fit for your industry

GoBD apply to practically every business in Germany. But what about BaFin requirements for banks and insurance companies? Patient files with retention periods of ten years and more in healthcare? CMR consignment notes in logistics? Customs documents for 10 years? Industry-specific compliance can be a hard knockout criterion.

5

Hosting model and data location

Cloud, on-premises or hybrid. EU hosting, hosting in Germany, hosting in Frankfurt. Is there a list of sub-processors, and is it transparent? A data processing agreement under GDPR Art. 28? Are the technical and organizational measures current? In sensitive industries or a banking and insurance context this is not negotiable, and it often settles the matter in pre-screening.

6

Vendor factor: support over the contract term

Who looks after you over the contract term? A large vendor with a ticket system, or a mid-sized vendor with a named contact? A short path for adjustments, or a long change request procedure? This becomes relevant after go-live, and it decides whether you are still happy with your choice after 2 years. The sales experience says little about the operating experience.

Six criteria, structured for your case?

In the initial call we work out which of the six criteria carry weight in your case and which you can safely skip. Request an initial call

Three vendor archetypes in the German-speaking market

The DMS market in the German-speaking region consists essentially of three vendor archetypes with clearly different profiles. None of them is better than the others; the right choice depends on your company profile.

Large enterprise DMS vendor

Typical profile > 1,000 employees, international presence, publicly listed or private-equity backed. Global breadth of functionality.
Strengths Enterprise breadth of functionality, many modules, international compliance standards, an established training infrastructure.
Weaknesses Often longer contract terms, a heavier implementation, individual requests usually routed through ticket processes.
When it fits

Very large mid-sized companies (> 500 employees) with international operations or group structures.

Industry specialist

Typical profile A mid-sized vendor focused on one or two industries (construction, logistics, insurance, healthcare). Depth instead of breadth.
Strengths Industry-specific workflows, industry compliance already solved, an understanding of the industry's language.
Weaknesses Narrow for broader use cases, tied to the industry's workflow logic, possibly less flexible in special situations.
When it fits

Companies whose main process matches exactly the industry the vendor specializes in.

Mid-market DMS vendor

Typical profile Owner-run or family-run, a manageable team size, usually the German-speaking region. Industry-neutral.
Strengths Personal support, direct feedback, pricing models you can understand, transparent implementation estimates, short decision paths.
Weaknesses Fewer modules than enterprise DMS products, possibly fewer international compliance standards, smaller training operations.
When it fits

Mid-sized companies (10 to 500 employees) with a clear use case pain and a wish for personal support.

Where does MAAS fit in? MAAS is a mid-market DMS vendor with OXS.eco, focused on accounts payable, e-invoicing, archiving and case files. If you need international group functions or a very specific industry solution (a construction project management tool, a hospital information system), we may not be the right choice, and we will tell you so openly in the initial call. This page is written neutrally because we would rather be one of three vendors you evaluated than the only one that sold itself well.

Five typical selection pitfalls

We keep running into these five traps in selection processes. All of them can be avoided once you know them.

1. A feature list instead of a concrete use case

✕
Often done wrong:A 200-line requirements document with must-have and nice-to-have columns and no prioritization. Vendors fill in spreadsheet cells, nobody checks depth.
✓
Better:Have vendors show your most important use case and prove it on your real documents before the full rollout. A good vendor will tell you which requirements are unimportant or turn counterproductive, and that is a good sign.

2. The lowest license price wins

✕
Often done wrong:The license price is the primary criterion. "The cheapest offer gets the contract." Implementation and follow-up costs are then experienced later as surprises.
✓
Better:Calculate the total cost over the full term. License, rollout, interfaces, training, and the cost of leaving at the end. Ask for every line item whether it is charged or included: the one-off rollout effort often weighs more than the monthly license.

3. A prepared demo instead of proof on real data

✕
Often done wrong:Vendors show perfectly prepared demos with their own test data. Everything runs smoothly. The decision is made on the basis of those demos.
✓
Better:Ask for proof on your real documents before the full rollout starts. Some vendors offer a paid proof of concept before the contract for this, others start with a small first step for one use case and only expand once it convinces you. Get scope and price in writing either way. What looks smooth in a sales demo can break on real data.

4. Underestimating the implementation effort on your side

✕
Often done wrong:"The vendor will handle it. We hand over the data and then it runs." No IT or department capacity planned in.
✓
Better:Plan your own capacity realistically: provide a sample of documents, clean up master data, document workflows, train test users. Even a simple rollout takes up working time from your own staff. Ask the vendor what exactly it needs from you, and plan for it.

5. Ignoring switching costs and data export

✕
Often done wrong:The contract is signed without checking the exit path. Years later it turns out that the data export is billed separately and that termination is only possible on fixed dates.
✓
Better:Before signing, work out how you would get out again. Data export format, data export effort, notice periods, what happens if the vendor becomes insolvent. A good vendor does not turn the switch into a trap.

Concrete next steps

Once you have worked through the points above, this is a pragmatic path in five steps.

  1. Write your requirements down in a structured way.With weighting, agreed between IT and the department. Whether that is a spreadsheet, a document or a ticket system matters less; what counts is prioritization and a shared picture.
  2. Approach three vendors, not eight.Three quotes can still be compared properly; eight mainly tie up your own time. Pick one representative from each of the three archetypes, or two from the archetype that fits you best plus one for comparison.
  3. Ask all three vendors what the proof on real documents looks like.What gets tested with your documents, when, and what does it cost? What shows up there would otherwise only show up during the rollout, and correcting it is more expensive by then.
  4. Ask about their experience.Ask every vendor for experience from comparable projects of your size. Ask what the implementation took, what came as a surprise, and what support is like day to day.
  5. Have the contract reviewed.Data export, termination, hosting, sub-processors, price increase clauses, and how support and recovery are handled. This is where the consequences for the whole term sit. At what contract volume a legal review pays off is for you to decide by your own standards.

Frequently asked questions about DMS selection

Usually not. A manageable, prioritized list with concrete use case scenarios takes you further than an extensive specification that nobody checks in depth.

That depends on modules, user roles, document volume and the number of connected systems. With OXS.eco, user licenses start at €15 per month, and the rollout is billed as project effort.

All starting prices and the individual cost components: What does a DMS cost?

That depends on how thorough you are: from a few weeks to several months, from the first clarification of requirements to the signature. What you should not skip: a clean clarification of requirements and a clear agreement on how the first use case will be tested on your documents.

External consulting mainly pays off for large project scopes, or when your industry brings complex requirements. Smaller projects usually manage without a consultant, given clear requirements and proof on real documents before the full rollout.

Clearly defined use cases, a weighted requirements list agreed between IT and the department, and a clear answer from every vendor on how they will prove their solution on your real documents before the full rollout.