Check an e-invoice Book a demo
Pricing & models

Price follows volume. Start with one use case. No big-bang cutover project.

OXS.eco does not sell off-the-shelf packages. We put your quote together individually after the initial call and a requirements review. It is driven by three factors: Number of users, Document volume and intake channels, plus modules and interfaces. The model scales from a small team to a large mid-sized company.

What goes into your quote
User licenses from €15 per user per month Tiered by role: search · workflow · document AI
AI invoice processing from €0.15 per document volume based, billed in blocks of 1,000 documents
ERP and accounting interfaces from €50 per month Diamant and MWare connected, others project based on request
Setup as project work, €110 per hour Rollout, interfaces and configuration billed by effort
Starting prices from the OXS.eco price list (as of September 2026). You get a binding price range with the written quote.
Transparent starting prices, custom quotes
Workspace, OXS.eco app and training included
Modular: building blocks as needed
Hosting in Frankfurt · GDPR compliant · aligned with GoBD
Pricing model

What determines your price: users, volume and intake channels

OXS.eco has no one-size-fits-all package. Three factors shape your custom quote. The number of users and your document volume drive the running costs, the number of intake channels drives the one-off rollout effort.

Typical fit Small teams to large mid-sized companies
Entry from 1 use case
Quote within 3 working days
Contact Management, directly
Why OXS.eco

What sets OXS.eco apart from typical enterprise DMS suites

Large DMS vendors offer powerful platforms, but often at project costs and rollout timelines that are out of proportion for a mid-sized company. OXS.eco is built for the German mid-market and scales from a small team to a large mid-sized company: the functional depth that document-heavy core processes need, at a price-performance ratio that fits mid-market budgets.

OXS.ecoTypical enterprise DMS
Rollout approach Step by step, use case by use case, no big-bang cutover project Big-bang project with a fixed cutover date and full scope
Modular entry Yes, from one use case Full package often required
Pilot operation at the start Yes, every rollout begins with one Depends on the vendor
Hosting in Germany Yes, Google Cloud in Frankfurt Partly available
Archive aligned with GoBD & e-invoicing Built into the archive and accounts payable Often an add-on or charged extra
Pricing model Modular by users, volume and channels Often license bundles with a minimum scope
From conversation to running process

How you get your quote

No tender process, no requirements catalogue before the first conversation. You move step by step from that initial call to a live process, starting with your most important use case.

01

Initial call in 15 minutes

We clarify departments, volumes and systems and discuss where OXS.eco fits. The demo on sample data follows in a separate session.

→
02

Requirements & scope

Modules, integrations, number of users, document volume, intake channels: out of that comes a concrete written quote.

→
03

A start tailored to you

Once you place the order, the timeline depends on your intake channels, your approval workflows and any data migration. How a rollout works →

Concrete rollout plan: How a rollout works step by step →
FAQ

Common questions about pricing & models

Monthly: user licenses by role, document volume, storage per terabyte and flat fees for interfaces. One-off: the rollout billed by effort, above all the configuration of your intake channels and interfaces. Your written quote lists both separately.

The demo costs nothing: sample documents, a demo system, no obligation. If you want the proof on your own process, you start with a single intake channel as a compact first quote. You pay only for that manageable entry step and extend once it convinces you.

Yes, and that is our preferred approach. Start with accounts payable or e-invoicing, for example, and extend to digital case files, the mailroom or document dispatch once the first use case is established.

That depends on the number of your intake channels, your approval workflows and any data migration. So we do not quote a blanket duration: the first use case goes live, further modules follow in stages.

Where we fit

When OXS.eco is a good fit and when it is not

Four profiles where we typically see strong effects, and two where we advise against it.

Strong fit

CFO of a mid-sized company with a growing document volume

Profile: From 50 to 500 employees, several sites, more than 300 incoming invoices a month, manual Excel lists for tracking early payment discounts.

Why it fits: Pricing scales with volume; Diamant is connected in production, further accounting systems on a project basis on request; early payment discount deadlines are visible, with reminders.

Strong fit

IT management under integration pressure

Profile: An existing system landscape (ERP, CRM, specialist systems), a new requirement from the e-invoicing obligation and PEPPOL receipt, hosting required in Germany.

Why it fits: REST API and a test integration environment after the order, e-invoice receipt by e-mail, upload, SFTP or PEPPOL, hosting in Frankfurt.

Strong fit

Accounting under early payment discount pressure

Profile: Fewer than 50 % of early payment discounts taken, approvals take 5 to 10 working days, plenty of queries asking "where is that invoice?".

Why it fits: Multi-stage approval workflows, notes on anomalies, status per invoice, reminders before early payment discount deadlines expire.

Strong fit

Insurance or freight forwarding with a case-file-driven business

Profile: Claim, contract, order or route case files at the core. High intake volumes from broker mail, e-mail intake or scan.

Why it fits: The case file model is configurable, roles are separated per case file type, broker mail can be processed in a structured way.

Less of a fit

A group with its own ECM standard

Profile: An existing group-wide DMS (SharePoint Enterprise, OpenText, Documentum) with a global standardisation requirement.

Why not: OXS.eco does not slot into a mandated group ECM standard. It only makes sense as a departmental solution alongside the group standard.

Less of a fit

A micro business with fewer than 10 employees

Profile: Few documents a month, simple bookkeeping, no need for workflows or case file logic.

Why not: OXS.eco is built for mid-sized companies with process complexity. For very small firms the implementation effort and the monthly cost are out of proportion. Our suggestion: lean accounting tools.

Hélène TinetInitial call, demo & onboarding

Next step

Quote within three working days.

Book a demo or a process call, describe your process, receive a written quote. You talk to a person from the MAAS team.

MAAS Filderstadt · since 1986